Reinisch Wilson Weier PC Workers' Compensation Defense and Employment Law

Live knee meniscectomy – stop reading if you’re the queasy type!

By Kelly Niemeyer and Christy Doornink, Sep 09, 2016

Surgeons Tackle a Knee Meniscectomy in Front of a Live Audience at the 71st Annual Workers’ Compensation Educational Conference

Kelly J. Niemeyer

Kelly J. Niemeyer

Christy Doornink

Christy Doornink

While attending the 71st Annual Workers’ Compensation Educational Conference held in Orlando, Florida, (wci360.com/conference) this last August, we were intrigued to find on the agenda a live surgical procedure performed by Dr. Travis B. Van Dyke and moderated by Dr. Lawrence S. Halperin, both from the Orlando Orthopedic Center.

As claims examiners and defense attorneys, we have all come across knee conditions requiring surgical intervention by way of a meniscectomy. The difference between reading about the procedure in the operative report and seeing the procedure as it is performed adds a new layer to understanding the mechanics of the knee. A meniscectomy is a common and minimally invasive outpatient procedure used to treat a torn meniscus cartilage in the knee. Depending on the extent of the pathology, post-operative recovery time, activities of daily living, work restrictions and claim processing can vary.

These pictures were taken during the live procedure and show a torn meniscus requiring a partial meniscectomy. Due to the location of the tear, in an avascular (low blood flow) area, the tear cannot simply be sutured as it would not scar over and heal. Rather, the procedure we observed involved the cutting out of the torn meniscus and shaving down and smoothing over of the affected area.

Despite what appeared to be extensive cutting, only 20-percent of the meniscus was removed during the live procedure. Notably, Dr. Van Dyke commented that in a procedure such as this, with removal of 20-percent of the meniscus, the patient can be expected to make a full recovery achieving pre-injury baseline status. The injured worker in this case, a roofer, was expected to return to work post-surgery within 4 to 6 weeks barring any complications. Notably, mild age-related arthritis was visualized around the medial femoral condyle, which was not considered work-related.

What can a claims examiner take away from this? Understanding the mechanics of the surgical procedure performed can be instrumental in allowing an examiner to fully appreciate the nature and extent of a worker’s condition and realistic expectations for recovery and disability. In addition, a better understanding of the nature of the procedure involved can help examiners to ask the right questions when attempting to process a claim. Finally, if asked to authorize a surgical procedure, an examiner may want to request that the procedure be filmed in order to allow other experts to visualize the pathology seen during surgery in order to allow for an objective assessment of the evidence from all relevant experts.

If you have questions relative to surgical procedure requests and the necessity and/or reasonableness of the proposed procedure, the attorneys at Reinisch Wilson Weier PC are happy to provide our insight and assistance.

Click here to download a pdf.

 

Previously:

Part 1: “Tackle work like it’s the next big football game.”

Coach Steve Spurrier draws parallels between football and the insurance industry at the 71st Annual Workers’ Compensation Educational Conference.

Coming next:

Part 3: “What happens when leaders from the largest third party administrator claims organizations sit down for a roundtable?”

Industry leaders get together at the 71st Annual Workers’ Compensation Educational Conference to discuss forecasts and predictions for workers’ compensation and the insurance industry Overall.



« Back to Workers’ Compensation Defense Blog